CE SPUN TRADUCATORII BIBLIEI DESPRE ANTICHRIST? 1. Martin Luther (1483-1546) (Lutheran): "Luther ... proved, by the revelations of Daniel and St. John, by the epistles of St. Paul, St. Peter, and St. Jude, that the reign of Antichrist, predicted and described in the Bible, was the Papacy ... Taken from JH Merle D'aubigne's History of the Reformation of the Sixteen Century, book vi, chapter xii, p. 215. TRADUCEREA: "Luther a dovedit prin descoperirile lui Daniel si ale sfantului Ioan si prin epistolele sfantului Pavel, Petru si Iuda, ca domnia lui Antichrist, prezisa si descrisa de Biblie, a fost Papalitatea." 2. John Calvin (1509-1564) (Presbyterian): "Some persons think us too severe and censorious when we call the Roman pontiff Antichrist. But those who are of this opinion do not consider that they bring the same charge of presumption against Paul himself, after whom we speak and whose language we adopt... I shall briefly show that (Paul's words in II Thess. 2) are not capable of any other interpretation than that which applies them to the Papacy." Taken from Institutes of the Christian Religion, by John Calvin. TRADUCEREA: "Unii cred ca e prea dur cand numim pe pontiful roman, Antichristul.Cei care cred asa, facand asa il acuza pe Pavel insusi, al carui limbaj il adoptam si noi. Va voi arata pe scurt cum cuvintele lui Pavel din 2 Tesaloniceni 2, nu pot avea o alta interpretare, ci doar aceea aplicabila papalitatii." 3. Thomas Cranmer (1489-1556) (Anglican): "Whereof it <b>...</b>
Antichrist
